Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Hector Rodrigo Soto v. United States of America et al
as 8:2013cv01167
Respondent:
Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States of America and Warden, U.S. Bureau of Prisons USP Atwater, Atwater, California
Petitioner:
Hector Rodrigo Soto
Kenneth Leaming v. USDC-WAWSE
as 13-70125
:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN DOE, Warden, FDC-SEATAC, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Leaming v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv01724
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Leaming
Respondent:
John Doe, FDC-Seatac, U.S Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nestor Quevedo-Roque v. USDC-CAFR
as 12-71366
:
In re: NESTOR QUEVEDO-ROQUE
Petitioner:
NESTOR QUEVEDO-ROQUE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Abullah Brown v. Linda Sanders, et al
as 11-56915
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABULLAH ROBERT BROWN, AKA Robert Brown
Respondent - Appellee:
LINDA SANDERS, Warden and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
McGuire v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGuire
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice , Joseph Russinello , U.S. Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGuire v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGuire
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice , Joseph Russinello , U.S. Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abdullah Robert Brown v. Linda Sanders et al
as 2:2011cv04066
Petitioner:
Abdullah Robert Brown
Respondent:
Linda Sanders and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
