Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 509
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant: United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Vilsack et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, Yellowstone to Uintas Connection and others
Defendant: Tom Vilsack, Randy Moore, Matthew Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06601
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Gallatin Wildlife Association et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff: Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council and Wildearth Guardians
Defendant: Mary Erickson, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2023cv00491
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant: United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Los Padres Forestwatch, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-55801
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, KEEP SESPE WILD COMMITTEE, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF OJAI and COUNTY OF VENTURA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, KARINA MEDINA, District Ranger, United States Forest Service, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, et al
as 23-35577
Plaintiff / Appellee: WILDERNESS WATCH, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?