Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Moore #275487 v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00859
Plaintiff: Shawn Dale Moore
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams, Ruben Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley #072158 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff: Rick Alton Foley
Defendant: Charles L Ryan , T Scott, Unknown Silvas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vanaman v. Marlow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00781
Plaintiff: Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant: Christopher Marlow, JT Shartle, Theresa Talpelcido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Christopher Radcliff v. Silva, et al
as 16-16814
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEE RADCLIFF
Defendant - Appellee: SILVA, Unknown Silva, named as Deputy Silva, OVERTON, Unknown Overton, named as Deputy Overton and FLUKER, Unknown Fluker, named as Deputy Fluker
Hadaller v. Solar Employment Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00618
Plaintiff: Gavin Hadaller
Defendant: Solar Employment Solutions LLC , Clint Taylor , Unknown Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00514
Defendant: Mesa Police Department, Unknown Silva and Unknown Constantini
Plaintiff: Thelester Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radcliff #135361 v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2014cv02607
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Radcliff
Defendant: Clarence W Dupnik, Unknown Silva, Unknown Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliff # 135361 v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2014cv02214
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Radcliff
Defendant: Clarence W Dupnik, Unknown Silva, Unknown Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?