Cases 11 - 20 of 1,724
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
Tabi v. Stephenson, et al.
as 24-3596
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS TABI
Defendant:
Deputy STEPHENSON, No. 9401 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Several Unnamed Security Officers at the Walmart Supercenter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bazan v. Walmart Associates, Inc., a Delaware Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04741
Plaintiff:
Angel Bazan
Defendant:
Walmart Associates, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Luis Echeveria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rios v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Ana Nataren Rios
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Rickey Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Guzman v. Walmart
as 4:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Mikanda v. Walmart Corporation
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Mikanda and Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
Walmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Malfavon v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Malfavon
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ramirez v. Certain Individuals et al
as 4:2024cv03323
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Certain Individuals and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
