Cases 21 - 30 of 1,127,381
NFLASH, INC., v. COMNET TECHNOLOGY GROUP et al
as 5:2024cv03634
Plaintiff:
NFLASH, INC., a California corporation doing business as OEMPCWorld.com
Defendant:
COMNET TECHNOLOGY GROUP and LUIS B. RIEFKOHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bond et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 4:2024cv03637
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Bond and Victoria Pike Bond
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Forest Chief Randy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Chan, Shaynna Myers, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
John Stefanski, City of San Rafael and Robert Sinnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03632
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAZDOG HOLDINGS LLC v. Twitch Interactive, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03638
Plaintiff:
RAZDOG HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
Twitch Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Beal v. Gritstone bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03640
Plaintiff:
Tammy Beal
Defendant:
Gritstone bio, Inc., Andrew R. Allen and Vassiliki Economides
Estrada v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03641
Plaintiff:
Martha A. Estrada
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
