Cases 21 - 30 of 53
MKay, Inc. et al v. City of Huntington Park, et al
as 2:2017cv01467
Defendant:
C4Eversystems, LLC, City of Huntington Park, Does and others
Plaintiff:
CBD, Inc., Cage Collective, Inc., Cruz Verde, Inc. and others
Fisk et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2016cv05889
Plaintiff:
Becky Fisk , Joshua Sanabria , Jacalyn Holsted and others
Defendant:
Jay Inslee , Patricia Lashway and Service Employees International Union Healthcare 775 NW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Sanabria-Ramirez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-72667
Petitioner:
MARTIN SANABRIA-RAMIREZ, AKA Juan Vasquez-Ramirez
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Moreno-Sanabria v. USA
as 3:2016cv00369
Petitioner:
Hugo Moreno-Sanabria
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stevie Bradford et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
Pete Flores, Alfredo Jimenez, Wilmer Y Abar and others
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA, Bank of America, N.A., Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Erick Sanabria-Lemus v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71169
Petitioner:
ERICK GEOVANNI SANABRIA-LEMUS, AKA Erick Polanco
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Ivan Sanabria-Archiga
as 14-50020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IVAN SANABRIA-ARCHIGA
Erick Sanabria-Lemus v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74469
Petitioner:
ERICK GEOVANNI SANABRIA-LEMUS, AKA Erick Polanco
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Armando Sanabria-Valdez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73625
Petitioner:
ARMANDO SANABRIA-VALDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sanabria #135669 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01156
Petitioner:
Juan Garcia Sanabria
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
