Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Jimenez v. Phoenix, City of
as 2:2014cv02534
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jimenez v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02444
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Vinicio Jimenez-Diaz
as 14-10153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VINICIO ANTONIO JIMENEZ-DIAZ, AKA Vinicio Jimenez
Jose Jimenez Pastrano v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73315
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO JIMENEZ PASTRANO, AKA Jose Antonio Jimenez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Marco Jimenez v. Unknown Codama, et al
as 13-15539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO JIMENEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN CODAMA, COMCARE, VALUE OPTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Enedino Gomez, et al v. Rossi Concrete, Inc., et al
as 12-80015
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ENEDINO DURAN GOMEZ, GERARDO DURAN TOVAR, REYNALDO GALVAN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ROSSI CONCRETE, INC., a California Corporation, JOSEPH JAMES ROSSI, an individual and ROSSI CONCRETE, INC. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN, an employee pension benefit plan
Jimenez v. Metrocities Mortgage LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Metrocities Mortgage LLC and First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jimenez v. Metrocities Mortgage LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Metrocities Mortgage LLC and First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jimenez v. Codama et al
as 2:2010cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Unknown Codama, Comcare, ValueOptions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
