Cases 21 - 30 of 62
U.S. Bank National Association v. James Mitchell et al
as 2:2017cv09089
Defendant:
Does, Terrance Gatlin, James Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. James Mitchell, et al
as 17-56905
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-BC5
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MITCHELL and JAMAL PARKER
Defendant:
RONALD WHITE, RAY SPARKS, TERRANCE GATLIN and others
Espinosa v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2017cv00710
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Ball, Dwayne Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US Bank National Association v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2017cv08453
Defendant:
DOES, Terrance Gatlin, James Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. James Mitchell, et al
as 17-56259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-BC5
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MITCHELL and JAMAL PARKER
Defendant:
RONALD WHITE, RAY SPARKS, TERRANCE GATLIN and others
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. James Mitchell, et al
as 17-56259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-BC5
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MITCHELL and JAMAL PARKER
Defendant:
RONALD WHITE, RAY SPARKS, TERRANCE GATLIN and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. James Mitchell et al
as 2:2017cv05353
Defendant:
Does, Terrance Gatlin, James Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Baker #46157 v. Pomeroy et al
as 2:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
John P Baker
Defendant:
Julia Barnett, S Force and Gatlin C Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
