Cases 21 - 30 of 5,187
Maria Chikhareva v. Antony Blinken et al
as 8:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Maria Chikhareva
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Senko et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2024cv03729
Plaintiff:
Artur Senko and Svetlana Kaff
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Melissa Maxim
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shan Bai v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 8:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Shan Bai
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
