Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Fulcher v. State of California et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fulcher
Defendant:
State of California and John Phillips Grant, M.D., III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fulcher v. State of California et al
as 4:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fulcher
Defendant:
State of California and John Phillips Grant, M.D., III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Phillips v. City of Oakland, et al
as 11-15613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, KAREN P. TANDY, SCOTT N. SCHOOLS and others
John Phillips v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-15614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hollis, II et al
as 2:2009cv01313
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
John Phillip Hollis, II, Kyle Hollis, III and Firedance Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
John Phillips v. City of Oakland, California, et al
as 08-16498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, KAREN P. TANDY, SCOTT N. SCHOOLS and others
Anderson v. Brunson
as 08-35132
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIP ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN BRUNSON
Phillips v. City of Oakland, California et al
as 3:2007cv03885
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Defendant:
City of Oakland, California, Karen P. Tandy, Scott N. Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips v. City of Oakland, California et al
as 4:2007cv03885
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Defendant:
Karen P. Tandy and Scott N. Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anderson v. Brunson
as 2:2007cv00635
Petitioner:
John Phillip Anderson
Respondent:
Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
