Cases 21 - 30 of 477
Barral v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Dustin Barral
Defendant:
Tim Garrett and Karen LeGrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Shields
Defendant:
State of Nevada Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections, NDOC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MANUEL RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEADENY, Doctor, MASHA JOHNS, Doctor and others
Garren v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ronald Garren
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Scott Davis, M. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burdsal v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burdsal
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Tim Garrett, Kara LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dave Clemens
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, K. LeGrand and T. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Wirth v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 22-16908
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES M. WIRTH
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
LeGrand v. DeMert Brands, LLC
as 3:2022cv07374
Plaintiff:
Condalisa LeGrand
Defendant:
DeMert Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Creekview IP, LLC v. Legrand North America, LLC
as 2:2022cv07909
Plaintiff:
Creekview IP, LLC
Defendant:
Legrand North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
