Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Shane Nickerson v. State of Montana, et al
as 21-35604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE PHILLIP NICKERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY ATTORNEY, TRAVIS ABNER and others
Nickerson v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2021cv00027
Petitioner:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nickerson v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2021cv00026
Defendant:
State of Montana, Caitlin Overland, Travis Abner and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane Nickerson v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 20-36055
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANE PHILLIP NICKERSON
Nickerson v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Flathead County, State of Montana, D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickerson v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2020cv00170
Petitioner:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nickerson v. Diesel USA, Inc.
as 5:2020cv07775
Defendant:
Diesesl USA, Inc., Diesel, S.p.A. and Terry Richardson
Plaintiff:
Haleigh Blair Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nickerson v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2020cv00083
Petitioner:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nickerson v. Lexis Nexis et al
as 6:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, D.O.C., Lexis Nexis and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickerson v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2020cv06326
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, San Quentin State Prison, Clarence Cryer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughn Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
