Cases 21 - 30 of 682
Rowe v. Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners et al
as 2:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners, Hardeep Soll, Rosalie M. Bordelove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yassin v. Nevada State
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Sam Yassin
Defendant:
Nevada State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rowe v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Brian Sandoval, 2011 Nevada State Assembly Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Annis v. Douglas County Sheriffs et al
as 3:2021cv00494
Plaintiff:
Willis B. Annis
Defendant:
Dougals County Sheriffs, Douglas County NV Prosecutors, Nevada State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Olsen et al
as 3:2021cv00374
Petitioner:
Kevin Sutton
Respondent:
Warden K. Olsen, Nevada, State of and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Weslie Martin
Defendant:
Nevada, State of and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00364
Petitioner:
Kevin Ray Holmes
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Nevada, State of, Offender Management Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
