Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cabral et al v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Defendant:
3535 LV NEWCO, LLC, Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC, Caesars Entertainment Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Margarita Cabral, Dustin Chapman, Stephanie Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability, Inc. et al v. Schultz et al
as 1:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability, Inc. , Charlene K. Quade , Rachel Holty and others
Defendant:
Thomas M. Schultz, Chris Beck, Margaret Chipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, et al v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.
as 17-55667
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
GCIU-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GCIU-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT FUND
Defendant-counter-plaintiff - Appellant:
QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC.
USA v. Quade Smith
as 17-30018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
QUADE SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quad Graphics, Inc. v. GCIU- Employer Retirement Fund
as 2:2016cv03418
Counter Claimant:
GCIU- Employer Retirement Fund
Defendant:
GCIU- Employer Retirement Fund
Counter Defendant:
Quad Graphics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Quad Graphics, Inc.
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund v. Quad Graphics Inc
as 2:2016cv03391
Plaintiff:
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Quad Graphics, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.