Cases 21 - 30 of 423
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Kyler Russell v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Kyler Russell
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Recinos et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Lacey Recinos and Oscar Recinos
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-35561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BALMUCCINO, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
Metoyer v. Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
as 2:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Metoyer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hooks v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv01000
Petitioner:
Ronald K Hooks
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Intervenor:
Workers United
Lemoine v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2023cv03504
Plaintiff:
JAMEE LEMOINE
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mallouk et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.