Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent: STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner: ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56280
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff: State of Connecticut, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al v. Wolf et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv05883
Plaintiff: OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Hawaii, State of New York, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
People of the State of California v. Betsy Devos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv04717
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii, People of the State of California, New Jersey, State of and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Education and Betsy DeVos
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, et al
as 20-16256
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH
Plaintiff / Appellee: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intern, et al
as 20-16176
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?