Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Unified School District No. 230, Johnson County, State of Kansas v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 3:2021cv02099
Defendant: James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Plaintiff: Unified School District No. 230, Johnson County, State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Unified School District No. 497, Douglas County, State of Kansas v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01911
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff: United School District No. 497, Douglas County, State of Kansas and Unified School District No. 497, Douglas County, State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH and others
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff: American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mikkel Jordahl, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 18-16896
Amicus Curiae: LAWRENCE GLICKMAN, Professor at Cornell University, 25 ARIZONA LEGISLATORS, GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant: MATT RYAN, JIM PARKS, in their official capacity as Coconino County Jail District Board of Directors Members, ART BABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MIKKEL JORDAHL and MIKKEL (MIK) JORDAHL, PC
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?