Cases 21 - 30 of 183
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-55988
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commiser of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
North American Association of Visionary Churches, et al v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-16287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VISIONARY CHURCHES, a California Corporation
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA YAGE ASSEMBLY, a California corporation, VINE OF LIGHT CHURCH and WINFIELD SCOTT STANLEY III
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. US Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Al Otro Lado, Inc. and Al Otro Lado
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection, US IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rosete v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Rosete
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
