Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Shasta View Irrigation Distric, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 20-36020
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-36009
Plaintiff: VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 3:2020cv05630
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party San Luis Water District, Non-Party Westlands Water District and Non-Party Panoche Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Stemen v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 4:2020cv03904
Defendant: United States of America, Robert Todd Eggert, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Jacob Thomas Stemen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00706
Plaintiff: Planning and Conservation League, Center for Biological Diversity and Restore The Delta
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00959
Plaintiff: South Delta Water Agency, California Water Impact Network, Central Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
City of Fernley v. United States Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00221
Plaintiff: City of Fernley and Fernley, City of
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Golden State Salmon Association et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv08319
Plaintiff: Institute for Fisheries Resources, Friends of the River, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Defendant: Bureau of Reclamation and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Pestmaster Services, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02120
Defendant: Pestmaster Services, Inc., Jeffrey M. Van Diepen, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: E. & J. Gallo Winery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Navajo Nation v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17088
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAVAJO NATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?