Cases 31 - 40 of 2,976
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luna v. Mood et al
as 2:2024cv01199
Defendant:
Linda Mood and Tim Stutzman
Plaintiff:
Juan Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harvey v. Instant Urgent Care et al
as 5:2024cv03888
Defendant:
Instant Urgent Care and Practice Crown Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tim Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Brock et al v City of Bellingham et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larsen, Robert Vincent Glorioso, Caleb Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Seth Fleetwood and City of Bellingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2024cv01697
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
Michael Novak, Tim Saxon, Marcus Treanor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joel Pilger Moving Pictures, LLC et al v. Revolution Thinking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Joel Pilger Moving Pictures, LLC and J. Joel Pilger
Defendant:
Tim Thompson and Revolution Thinking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
