Cases 31 - 40 of 39,234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roy v. Nightingale et al
as 3:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Todd Nightingale, Ronald Kisling, Aida Alvarez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff:
CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Judge David Rosenberg
as 2:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Judge David Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zielbauer #306410 v. Monarrez et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Zielbauer
Defendant:
Joseph Monarrez, III and Pima County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
