Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Glen Ward v. T. Carlin, et al
as 19-35096
Defendant / Appellee:
FRENCH, Lt., RIVERA, C/O, A. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN JONES WARD
Hawkins et al v. Ashford University, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Doe Individuals and Ashford University, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hawkins and Crystal Coursey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Murray et al v. Ashford TRS Sapphire VI LLC et al
as 3:2019cv08021
Defendant:
Centimark Corporation, Ashford Flagstaff LP, Remington Lodging & Hospitality LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larence Murray, Susan Blankenchip, Ashley Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Idaho Correctional Institution - Orofino et al
as 1:2018cv00484
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Institution, R. Valley, IDOC Subsidiaries and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Carlin et al
as 1:2018cv00324
Defendant:
A Weed, French, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NLRB v. Ashford TRS Nickel, LLC, et al
as 18-71872
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ASHFORD TRS NICKEL, LLC, ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. and AHT AFFILIATED ENTERPRISES, a single business enterprise and a single employer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
