Cases 31 - 40 of 891
Calderon Lopez v. O'Malley
as 24-250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Calderon v. Covello
as 24-122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CALDERON
Defendant / Appellee:
P. COVELLO, Warden
Romero Cardoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2
Petitioner:
CESAR ADALBERTO ROMERO CARDOZA, HELEN ROXANA JORGE CALDERON and MATEO SEBASTIAN ROMERO JORGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz v. Calderon et al
as 4:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Calderon, Romero, Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latina Marie Young v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09938
Plaintiff:
Latina Marie Young
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Officer Lawrence, Officer Ehring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Calderon v. Covello
as 2:2023cv02847
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon v. The People of the State of California
as 5:2023cv05907
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon-Lopez De Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4151
Petitioner:
DARLIN XIOMARA CALDERON-LOPEZ DE RODRIGUEZ, JEFERSON LEONEL RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON and DILAND ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv08244
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(HC) Calderon v. Board of Parole Hearings of CA
as 2:2023cv02554
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
