Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deborah Lee Wilson v. Kohls Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00564
Defendant:
Does and Kohls Department Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Wilson
Ringchop v. Guerrini Law Firm et al
as 4:2010mc80114
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Guerrini Law Firm, John Donald Guerrini and Matthew Jackson Taylor
Ringchop v. American Express Bank, FSB et al
as 4:2010mc80113
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
American Express Bank, FSB, Kenneth I. Chenault, Daniel T. Henry and others
Ringchop v. Jaffe and Asher, LLP et al
as 4:2010mc80115
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Jaffe and Asher, LLP, Sanford Stuart Asher, Gregory Eugene Galterio and others
Ringchop v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa - Central District
as 4:2010mc80116
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa - Central District
Rondeau v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2009cv06029
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Rondeau
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
