Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Powell v. Madden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02031
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Powell
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Howard, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01283
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Allen
Defendant: Howard, Chrystaline, J. Davi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02432
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Unknown - name not given We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv02485
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee
Defendant: Unknown - name not given
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernest Straughter v. Raymond Usher, IV, et al
as 13-55806
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERNEST LEE STRAUGHTER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND USHER, IV, an individual, BRYAN-MICHAEL PAUL COX, an individual, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC, a limited liability company and others
Ernest Cox, Jr., et al v. William Knipp
as 12-72919
Petitioner: ERNEST LEE COX, Jr.
Respondent: WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden
Ernest Turner v. V. M. Almager
as 11-57212
Petitioner - Appellant: ERNEST LEE TURNER
Respondent - Appellee: V. M. ALMAGER, Warden
Ernest Franklin v. L. S. McEwen
as 11-57026
Petitioner - Appellant: ERNEST LEE FRANKLIN
Respondent - Appellee: L. S. MCEWEN, Warden
Ernest Vaden v. Katheleen Dickinson, et al
as 11-16603
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERNEST LEE VADEN
Defendant - Appellee: KATHELEEN L. DICKINSON, Warden and JOSEPH GONZALES
Vaden v. Wheeler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02219
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Vaden
Defendant: Wheeler, V. Tapiz and Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?