Cases 31 - 40 of 43
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other:
Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified:
All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party:
Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peter Wilson v. Gateway Inc et al
as 2:2009cv07560
Defendant:
Chartis Warranty Services Inc, Gateway Inc, Richard D Snyder and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Chartis WarrantyGuard Inc, National Electronics Warranty Corporation and AIG Warranty Guard Inc
Plaintiff:
Peter Wilson
Intervenor Defendant:
National Electronics Warranty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huntington Learning Centers, Inc. v. The Education Gateway, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03200
Plaintiff:
Huntington Learning Centers, Inc. and Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.
Defendant:
The Education Gateway, Inc. and Audrey Gamble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC and NorthPeak Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
3COM Corporation, 3COM Corporation, 3COM Corporation and others
Counter-claimant:
U.S. Robotics Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. and others
Counter-defendant:
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC, NorthPeak Wireless, LLC, NorthPeak Wireless, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Miscellaneou:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schmidt et al v. Acer, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Raymond Schmidt, III, Kara Schmidt and Farmers Insurance Company o Oregon
Defendant:
Acer, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Best Buy Co. Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony, Inc.., Sony Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Acer America Corp. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,
as 3:2008cv05624
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corp., Acer America Corp., Acer America Corp. and others
Defendant:
WI-Lan, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Acer, Inc. et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
as 5:2008cv00877
Special Master:
Thomas HR Denver
Defendant:
Patriot Scientific Corporation, Alliacense Limited and Technology Properties Limited
Plaintiff:
Acer, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Acer America Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Non Party Texas Instruments Incorporated and LSI Corporation
Interested Party:
HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Kwan Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rena Otto v. Gateway Inc
as 8:2007cv00491
Plaintiff:
Rena Otto
Defendant:
Gateway Inc, -
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Multimedia Patent Trust v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00747
Plaintiff:
Multimedia Patent Trust, Multimedia Patent Trust, Multimedia Patent Trust and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Dell Inc, Dell Inc, Dell Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Inc., Multimedia Patent Trust, Multimedia Patent Trust and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Gateway US Retail Inc, Gateway Inc., Gateway Professional LLC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
