Cases 31 - 40 of 618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ah Puck v. State of Hawaii Court System et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
King Hardy Keolama Ah Puck, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Hawaii Court System, Brandon L. K. Paredes and Aloha Mart and Gas Station
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wesley Randle v. Kate Hardie et al
as 2:2023cv06253
Plaintiff:
Wesley Randle
Defendant:
Kate Hardie, Los Angeles Public Defenders Office and City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomahawk Manufacturing, Inc. et al v. Spherical Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Tomahawk Manufacturing, Inc. and Formtec, LLC
Defendant:
Spherical Industries, Inc., Spherical Industries Holdings LLC, Christopher Michael Duggan and others
Hardy v. Kish, et al.
as 1:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Avalon Hardy
Defendant:
Michael Kish, Troy DeBie, Kyle Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
as 23-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJALI WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH LAWRENCE, CHAU NGUYEN, MARK ROBISON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hardy v. Bhupinder Singh et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hardy
Defendant:
Bhupinder Singh and GRK Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
