Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Clark County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv05241
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. F/K/A Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Clark County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Thurston County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv05238
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. F/K/A Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thurston County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
King County v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 3:2018cv05086
Plaintiff:
Pierce County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Acedo v. County of San Diego
as 3:2017cv02592
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acedo
Defendant:
County of San Diego , Carlos Olmeda , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Acedo v. Francis Abalos, et al
as 16-56534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ACEDO
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS ABALOS, CHRISTINA VICKERY, FLYNN, Captain and others
Daniel Acedo v. Francis Abalos, et al
as 16-56538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ACEDO
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS ABALOS, CHRISTINA VICKERY, FLYNN, Captain and others
Acevedo v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2016cv02042
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
San Diego, County of and John and Jane Doe 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Acedo v. Abalos et al
as 3:2015cv02532
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acedo
Defendant:
Francis Abalos, Christina Vickery, Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
