Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Powers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv03055
Plaintiff:
James Dean Powers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Powers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2009cv03055
Plaintiff:
James Dean Powers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James Wilks v. FAA
as 09-71631
Petitioner:
JAMES DEAN WILKS
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Wilks v. Van Olst et al
as 2:2009cv00651
Defendant:
Kathy Cullen Van Olst, Dale Porter, Sergeant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Prosper et al
as 2:2008cv01081
Plaintiff:
James Dean Taylor
Defendant:
Kathy Prosper, Anglea, - Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Egy v. Evans, et al
as 2:2008cv00694
Petitioner:
James Dean Egy
Respondent:
Michael Evans and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Vernette Stowers, A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crosthwaite et al v. Hamman's Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00680
Plaintiff:
Gil Crosthwaite, Gil Crosthwaite, Russ Burns and others
Defendant:
Hamman's Inc. and James Dean Hamman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wilks v. Stowers et al
as 2:2007cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
Vernette Stowers, T. Hansen, Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2007cv01720
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Hansen, M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
