Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Gonzales v. USA
as 1:2016cv00084
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Henry Joe Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gebauer et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 9:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
Michael Gebauer , Kim McDonald , Jason Demery and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauer v. USA
as 4:2015cv00052
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lawrence Joe Bauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
State of Montana, Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartsoe v. Doyle et al
as 6:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Hartsoe
Defendant:
Jay Doyle, Debra Christopher, Mike McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Usrey v. Deyott et al
as 6:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Usrey
Defendant:
Denise Deyott, T.K., C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Allottees Association et al v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Crow Allottees Association , Rosalla Bear Don't Walk , Sharon Bear Don't Walk and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior and Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Headwaters Resources v. Bakken Solids Control Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Headwaters Resources
Defendant:
Bakken Solids Control Inc. and Joe Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothing v. Lambert et al
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Peter Rothing
Defendant:
Marty Lambert , Joe Skinner , Steve White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. State of Montana et al
as 4:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Sharp
Defendant:
State of Montana, Merle Raph, Laurie McKinnon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
