Cases 31 - 40 of 84
(PC)Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01881
Defendant:
Kuntz, Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01716
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC, Conestoga International, LLC, Conestoga Trust Services, LLC and others
David Martinez v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-16346
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID LUIS MARTINEZ
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
LT Properties v. Luis Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv07905
Plaintiff:
LT Properties
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 and Luis Martinez
Jose Martinez-Flores v. William Barr
as 19-72134
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ-FLORES, AKA Jose Luismarti Flores, AKA Jose Martinez, AKA Jose Luis Martinez, AKA Jose Luis Martinezflores
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Martinez-Romero #311110 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04818
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Luis Martinez-Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez #317340 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04481
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
David Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Angel Martinez Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 19-70097
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ANGEL MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ, AKA Angel Jose Martinez, AKA Jose Luis Martinez Rodriguez
Martinez v. Patton et al
as 3:2018cv03480
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant:
B. Patton, D. Melton and C. Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Love v. Jaime Martinez et al
as 5:2018cv01251
Defendant:
DOES, Jaime Martinez, Jaime Luis Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
