Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Maxwell v. Kim
as 3:2016cv01192
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell
Defendant:
Grace M. Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Beard
as 2:2015cv01313
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, D. L. Runnels, G. Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2015cv01285
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Woodson
Defendant:
Ortiz, Orduna, M. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson
as 3:2014cv04958
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Thuddy, F. Kreitler, L. W. Rohlfing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Fox et al
as 2:2014cv01743
Plaintiff:
Donnell Boyce
Defendant:
Michael Fox, M Kim, S. Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Fox et al
as 4:2014cv02900
Plaintiff:
Donnell Boyce
Defendant:
Michael Fox, M. Kim, S. Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmella Denise London v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv02672
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
Cedina M Kim
Plaintiff:
Carmella Denise London
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant:
475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant:
475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
