Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Moye v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, State of California, Lydia Dianne Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moye v. People of the State of California
as 4:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moye v. Zephyr Real Estate et al
as 3:2009cv05464
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Zephyr Real Estate, Bonnie Spindler, Earl Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moye v. Zephyr Real Estate et al
as 4:2009cv05464
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Zephyr Real Estate, Bonnie Spindler, Earl Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moye v. Big Nates Barbeque et al
as 3:2009cv03898
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Big Nates Barbeque and Nate Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moye v. City & County of San Francisco
as 3:2009cv03892
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moye v. Myriad Ventures Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv03899
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Myriad Ventures Inc. and Jack Chew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moye v. Jiraittewanna
as 3:2009cv03895
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Ratana Jiraittewanna
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moye v. Duncan
as 3:2009cv03900
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
La Donna Rewa Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moye v. Baca et al
as 3:2009cv03897
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Lydia Dianne Baca and Rachcael Young
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
