Cases 31 - 40 of 234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Covello
as 3:2022cv09104
Petitioner:
Marquies Ebon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Marquis Hawkins
as 22-10324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS LEONARD HAWKINS
Brown v. Becker
as 3:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Brion Marquis Brown
Defendant:
Tiffany Becker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. City and County Honolulu
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Marquis Johnson
Defendant:
City and County Honolulu, Jacob D. Mecham, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Marquis Elliott Harrison v. People of the State of CA
as 5:2022cv01746
Petitioner:
Marquis Elliott Harrison
Respondent:
People of the State of CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Brion Marquis Brown
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
