Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 137
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Nava v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
as 2:2017at00130
Plaintiff: Mario A. Nava
Defendant: Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Nava v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00296
Plaintiff: Mario A. Nava
Defendant: Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bill Haviland v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv09503
Defendant: AT and T Corp., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff: Bill Haviland
William Davidson, et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al
as 16-17252
Plaintiff - Appellee: WILLIAM DAVIDSON and PEARL DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellant: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., as successor in-interest to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.and Western Electric Compnay Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA BTL, FKA Lucent Technologies, Inc., AT&T CORP., individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA and PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories
Defendant: NOKIA USA INC., individually and as successor in interest to Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. and Western Electric Company Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv07747
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davidson et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05766
Plaintiff: William Davidson and Pearl Davidson
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , AT&T Corp. , Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandoval et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03406
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC , AT&T Services, Inc. , Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Plaintiff: Karla Sandoval , Fernando Felix , Mariana Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00792
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC et al v. Picker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02461
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC , Pacific Bell Telephone Company , California Cable & Telecommunications Association and others
Defendant: Michael Picker , Mike Florio , Catherine J. K. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. McKenzie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00737
Plaintiff: Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Pacific Bell Telephone Company Doing business as AT&T Services, Inc.
Defendant: McKenzie and Kim McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Labor › Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?