Cases 31 - 40 of 598
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Green v. Raymond Madden
as 22-16724
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL GREEN, AKA Kevin Dean Brewer
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-56027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Michael Green v. USDC-CASF
as 22-70242
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL GREEN and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GREEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Raymond Madden and ICC Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Madden
as 5:2022cv06480
Petitioner:
Darren Michael Peters
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
as 22-55959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer and others
Derrick Butler v. Raymond Madden
as 22-55955
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK JAMES BUTLER
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
(HC) Bailey v. Madden
as 1:2022cv01273
Petitioner:
Demetris Frank Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hopper v. Madden et al
as 2:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, A. Palacios, P. Bracamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
