Cases 31 - 40 of 3,348
Norris v. Ronning Development et al
as 6:2024cv00014
Defendant:
Clear Creek Construction, Ronning Development and Clear Creek Builders
Plaintiff:
Andrew Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Muske et al v. Ronning Develpment et al
as 6:2024cv00013
Defendant:
Clear Creek Construction, Ronning Develpment, Clear Creek Builders and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Muske and Noelle Muske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mistry v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Sapna Mistry
Defendant:
Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bailey v. Borla
as 3:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Jasper Bailey
Respondent:
Ron E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd Allard et al v. KIA America, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
TODD ALLARD, CHRIS BROWNFIELD, RON BRUSHI and others
Defendant:
KIA AMERICA, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stanley v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mark Stanley
Defendant:
CDCR, San Quentin State Prison, R. Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Borla
as 3:2023cv06658
Petitioner:
Jasper Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
