Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Seaton v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00183
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Brett William Seaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Mitchell v. Snowden, et al
as 13-16108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SNOWDEN, Correctional Officer at CA State Prison Sacramento, New Folson, SEATON, C/O, LARIOS, C/O and others
Baldwin et al v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01720
Plaintiff:
Katrina Frances Baldwin and Phoebe Seaton
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. , Organon Biosciences NV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Colfin AI CA 4 LLC v. Marian Seaton
as 5:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Colfin AI CA 4 LLC
Defendant:
Marian Seaton
Colfin AI CA 4 LLC v. Marian Seaton et al
as 5:2012cv02122
Plaintiff:
Colfin AI CA 4 LLC
Defendant:
Does and Marian Seaton
Walden et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04641
Plaintiff:
Virgil Walden, Jr. , Ronald Thompson , James Herring and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slojkowski v. Clark County Family Services et al
as 2:2012cv00907
Defendant:
Clark County Family Services, Bree Seaton and Mary Terzian
Plaintiff:
Carmeno Slojkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen Seaton v. Michael Astrue
as 12-16216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN GENE SEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Crypton, Inc. v. California Furnishings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04579
Plaintiff:
Crypton, Inc.
Defendant:
California Furnishings, Inc. and Mary Seaton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Crypton, Inc. v. California Furnishings, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04579
Plaintiff:
Crypton, Inc.
Defendant:
California Furnishings, Inc. and Mary Seaton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.