Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 99
State of Washington et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03127
Plaintiff: State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Wisconsin and others
Defendant: Donald J Trump, United States of America, Louis DeJoy and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Seattle, Amici Curiae Brady and Team Enough, Amici Curiae Members of Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
State of California et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00440
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent: STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner: ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56280
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
State of Washington, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-36047
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant: LOUIS DEJOY, in his official capacity as United States Postmaster General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant: Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
as 20-73276
Petitioner: STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Respondent: ANDREW WHEELER, as Adminsitrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Environmental Protection Agency
State of Washington et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff: State of Connecticut, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?