Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Sandoval v. Corizon LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Felipe Sandoval
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, D Spencer Sego, Joanne Grafton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Sego et al
as 2:2016cv03955
Defendant:
Daniel Sego and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Robert Dennis Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brenda Ostler v. Keith Sego, et al
as 16-16604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA OSTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SEGO, individually and as husband, RITA SEGO, individually and as wife and UNKNOWN PARTIES, John Does and/or Jane Does I-X and Black Corporations and/or White Corporations I-X
Arteaga-Salas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02421
Plaintiff:
Pedro Arteaga-Salas
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon, Daniel Sego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacific Botanicals, Inc. v. Roger Sego et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Defendant:
Victor Osztrovics and Roger Sego
Plaintiff:
Pacific Botanicals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ostler v. Sego et al
as 3:2015cv08026
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ostler
Defendant:
Keith Sego , Unknown Parties and Rita Sego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sego v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2013cv02553
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sego v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02389
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Correctional Health Services, Inmate Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sego v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sego v. Ainly et al
as 3:2013cv08029
Defendant:
Unknown Ainly and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
God Kenneth Wayne Sego, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
