Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Tony Roberts v. J. Beard, et al
as 17-56830
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONY ANTHONY ROBERTS, AKA Tony Roberts
Defendant - Appellee: J. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden and others
Seibel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04420
Plaintiff: Janet K Seibel
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble v. Seibel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02468
Plaintiff: Daniel Joseph Noble
Defendant: Kimberly Seibel and Jaime Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varnado v. Seibel et al
as 2:2017at01230
Petitioner: Erion Demonta Varnado
Respondent: Kimberly A. Seibel and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Varnado v. Seibel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02413
Petitioner: Erion Demonta Varnado
Respondent: Kimberly A. Seibel and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Jones v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-17275
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE DENNIS JONES
Respondent - Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Craig Garrett v. J. Gastelo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-56598
Plaintiff - Appellant: CRAIG KAISER GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee: J. GASTELO, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, Director of Corrections, G. CASIAN, Dr. and others
Enrique Ortega v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-56327
Petitioner - Appellant: ENRIQUE ORTEGA
Respondent - Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Ngo v. Seibel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01815
Plaintiff: Ky Ngo
Defendant: K Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ngo v. Seibel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv04362
Petitioner: Ky Ngo
Respondent: K. Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?