Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Deborah Cooney v. City of San Diego, et al
as 19-16180
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 19-15729
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, FRANK ROESCH, ROBERT R. TOY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-15580
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Camacho v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 3:2018cv02691
Defendant:
Leondra Kruger, Marian-Florentino Cuellar, Ming Chin and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Camacho and Ali Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ray v. Diaz et al
as 5:2018cv06813
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig, M. Voong, Ralph M. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Hadsell v. Barry Baskin, et al
as 18-16668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY BASKIN, in his individual capacity, KIMBERLY CAMPBELL, in her individual capacity, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in her individual and official capacity as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of California and others
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-16304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Karim Kamal v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 18-55759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in official capacity and PATRICIA A. BIGELOW, in official capacity
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-15933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
