Cases 41 - 50 of 336
Robert Pope v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-56112
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT POPE
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and WARREN C. MONTGOMERY, Party of Interest
Pope v. San Jose Regional Trauma Unit
as 5:2022cv07338
Plaintiff:
George Pope
Defendant:
San Jose Regional Trauma Unit, Insurance Company of the West and Reyna Custom Chopping
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Lucas et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
David Lucas, Deborah Bennett, Marchae Winston and others
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc. and Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tutankhaman v. Woods et al
as 2:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, Dr. Michael D Gates, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Woods
Tutankhaman v. Nestle
as 2:2022cv01877
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, King Dr. Michael V. Dumpledore, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Nestle
Pope et al v. Blunden et al
as 2:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Richard L Pope, Jr and Kathleen E Pope
Defendant:
Abby Blunden, Maria Frieboes, Tim Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones, et al. v. Pope
as 1:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
David D Jones and Faavaoa Jones
Defendant:
Thomas J Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Manalisay v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
James Manalisay
Defendant:
Boydine Hall, Adam Byer, Toni Mims-Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eton Pope v. Ron Haynes
as 22-35617
Petitioner / Appellant:
ETON MARCEL POPE
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
