Cases 41 - 50 of 5,901
Hill v. Medical Staff from Program 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Medical Staff from Program 1, Monique and Jenny Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rita
as 4:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Rita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Gus Hill
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana State Prison, James Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. PT Abie
as 4:2024cv02545
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Medical Staff PT Abie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margret Hill et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03484
Plaintiff:
Margret Hill and Trenita Wilson
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
(PC)Parker v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Akika Parker
Defendant:
Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento Sheriff Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tudor DuPont, et al. v. Sterling Family Trust, et al.
as 24-2636
Plaintiff:
AL TUDOR DUPONT and AURELIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
STERLING FAMILY TRUST, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, individually and as sole Trustee of Sterling Family Trust, and as Manager of Beverly Hills Properties LLC, DOES, 1-20, inclusive and others
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Brigitte et al
as 4:2024cv02436
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Brigitte, Yolanda and Kumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
