Cases 41 - 50 of 5,901
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benton v. BBBB Bonding Corp., et al
as 2:2024at00562
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
BBBB Bonding Corporation, Clifford Jeffery Stanley and Robert Hill-Venn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Hill v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
James E. Hill
Defendant:
Julie Williams and C. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boreago et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Boreago, L. Rodriguez, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02578
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Dr. Mann, Fennie Clay and Dr. Sabfive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Medical Staff from Program 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Medical Staff from Program 1, Monique and Jenny Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
