Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Swanson v. Martel et al
as 2:2009cv03245
Plaintiff:
Chad Swanson
Defendant:
Michael Martel, Duncan Fallon, L. B. Reaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair et al v. Hoban Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02008
Plaintiff:
Starla Blair, Samuel Blair, L. B. and others
Defendant:
Hoban Management, Inc. and Raymond E. Sporer an individual doing business as Tiara Green Apartments
Guardian Ad Litem:
Linda Hudgins and Billy Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Little v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2008cv05702
Plaintiff:
Donald Little
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Homeland Security Federal Protective Service, R Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Richard Anaya v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 08-17388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, N. GRANNIS, CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH, M.D. and others
Michael Roberts v. Joe McGrath, et al
as 08-15890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE MCGRATH, Warden, T. TRAVIS, D. LUNA and others
Eric K'napp v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 08-15809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK HICKMAN, N. ALI, BROYLES and others
CMA v. Conagra Foods, Inc
as 2:2007cv05842
Plaintiff:
C. M. A., C. M. A., C. M. A. and others
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc, Conagra Foods, Inc, Conagra Foods, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wensel v. Subia, et al
as 2:2007cv00900
Plaintiff:
Shaw Ronald Wensel
Defendant:
R. J. Subia, E. M. Hyland and L. B. Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. Campbell, et al
as 2:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Richard Ernest Anaya
Defendant:
Rosanne Campbell, N. Grannis, Christopher J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
