Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Eddie Joe Bush v. Washington State DOC
as 2:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Eddie Joe Bush
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eddie Joe Bush v. Washington State DOC
as 2:2008cv05063
Plaintiff:
Eddie Joe Bush
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Newkirk et al v. Conagra Foods Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00273
Plaintiff:
Larry I Newkirk, Larry I Newkirk, Ruth A Newkirk and others
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc, Shopko Stores Inc, Shopko Stores Operating Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Keyter v. Bush et al
as 3:2008cv05509
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keyter
Defendant:
George W Bush, John G. Roberts, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harper et al v. Bush et al
as 3:2008cv05154
Plaintiff:
John Harper and Lana Kudina
Defendant:
Mark Bush and Pyramid Homes Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Vernette Stowers, A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reitz v. Federal Government et al
as 2:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Robin M Reitz
Defendant:
Federal Government, Carter, Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bush v. Goff
as 3:2007cv05636
Petitioner:
Eddie Joe Bush
Respondent:
Steven M Goff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffine v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv01451
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eldon Huffine
Defendant:
United States of America, Justice Department, George Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv01418
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, G W Bush, A Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
