Cases 41 - 50 of 472
Carlton v. AmGUARD Ins. Co.
as 2:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Dan Carlton
Defendant:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. AmGUARD Ins. Co.
as 2:2022at01150
Plaintiff:
Dan Carlton
Defendant:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Tri Huynh v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 22-16188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRI MINH HUYNH
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART, INC., A Delaware corporation, DOUG MCMILLON, BRETT BIGGS and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART.COM USA LLC, RACHEL BRAND, GREGORY B. PENNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sarrah Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell, Sarrah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Carlton Ray Smith
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau and City of Portland, OR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Callins v. Mason, et al
as 1:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Carlton Ray Callins
Defendant:
C. Mason, D. Garrison, A. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ranjan v. Hadden
as 6:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Dinesh Ranjan
Defendant:
Director Carlton M. Hadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
