Cases 41 - 50 of 861
Owens v. Fogarty et al
as 3:2023cv03812
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oliver Owens
Defendant:
Fogarty, Martinez, Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kennie Del Cardenas v. Kilolo KijakaziSecurity
as 8:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Kennie Del Carmen Cardenas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cardenas v. Garland
as 23-1490
Petitioner:
ANGEL CARDENAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bubak v. Cardenas Markets, LLC
as 2:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul Bubak
Defendant:
Cardenas Markets, LLC doing business as Cardenas Markets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doell v. Cardenas Markets, LLC
as 2:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Amanda Doell
Defendant:
Cardenas Markets, LLC and Cardenas Markets, LLC doing business as Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mao Cardenas et al v. County of Ventura, et al
as 2:2023cv05482
Plaintiff:
Mao Cardenas and Estate of Tomoko Hoetzlein
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VENTURA,, Sevet Johnson, CITY OF CAMARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Watts v. Cardenas et al
as 2:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Vernell Watts
Defendant:
A. Cardenas, G. Moua, D. Dunigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
