Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Larry v. City of The Dalles et al
as 3:2009cv00663
Plaintiff:
Robert J Larry
Defendant:
City of The Dalles, Wasco County, Sean Lundry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ed Wong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Casey et al v. MML Investor Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Ed Casey and Joanne Casey
Defendant:
MML Investor Services, Inc., MML Investor Services, Inc., MML Investor Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Merrihew et al v. MML Investor Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01223
Defendant:
American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., Umpqua Bank, David P. Grau and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Carney, Mary Denson, Edward Reinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00816
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
City of Ashland v. Schafer et al
as 1:2008cv03048
Plaintiff:
City of Ashland
Defendant:
Ed Schafer, Abigail Kimbell, Linda Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Eddings v. Public Storage
as 3:2008cv00269
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eddings
Defendant:
Public Storage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mission Capital Works, Inc. v. SC Restaurants, Inc.
as 3:2007mc09260
Plaintiff:
Mission Capital Works, Inc.
Defendant:
SC Restaurants, Inc.
Receiver:
Ed Hostmann, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00369
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00369
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
